<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>asnaedae @ home &#187; languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dubdubdub.co.uk/tag/languages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dubdubdub.co.uk</link>
	<description>random musings from a twisted mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>fad languages</title>
		<link>http://dubdubdub.co.uk/2007/10/node-613</link>
		<comments>http://dubdubdub.co.uk/2007/10/node-613#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img style='float: right;' class='reflect' src='/files/kbd.gif' >
Fad languages, last it was ruby (and rails) and now it's erlang, previously it was python, and before that was java - each here to save the world and provide world peace - ok, so perhaps not the last one. 


I like the idea of rails, the language is pretty nice too - but my goodness it's slow - and i used to think java was bad (well it was - for totally different reasons). Interesting notes about the java community wanting closures, though it did take me a while to remember what they are! Though I never truly did grok the usage of lambda closures; which is probably a good thing really. 



Ah, LPC - definitely the easiest way to learn an object orientated language - certainly makes things a lot more concrete for understanding - didn't like C++ for probably the same reason - despite it being probably a little cleaner to use. Heh, be interesting to see what the next fad is ---  <a href="http://dubdubdub.co.uk/2007/10/node-613">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dubdubdub.co.uk/2007/10/node-613/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

